2024-05-04 04:44:48
Section 10 & 25 – Custody of child – Paramount consideration is welfare and interest of child and not the right of parents under a statute – Better financial resources of either of parents under a statute – Better financial resources of either of parents or their love for child may be one of relevant considerations but cannot be sole determining factor for custody of child – Child has in very clear terms expressed the desire to stay with father which shows that he is being looked after properly and is already studying in a good school at father’s place – Nothing on record to suggest that Welfare of child is in any way in peril in hands of father – Child’s interest and welfare will be best served if he continues to be in custody of father – Order of High Court giving exclusive custody of child to father with visitation right to mother deserves to be maintained.
DISCLAIMER : The above judgement is posted for informational purpose only. Printout/Copy from this website are not admissible citation in the Court of Law. For a court admissible copy contact your advocate.
Supreme Court Landmark Judgement on Maintianance - RAJNESH Versus NEHA
Know MoreParamount consideration is welfare and interest of child and not the right of parents
Know MoreSupreme Court Judgement to Reinforce The Rajnesh versus Neha Directions
Know More